The Absence of Queer Contexts in Global Health
Global health’s frequent overlooking of queer people’s experience is particularly striking given its vision of ‘including the excluded’ and the significant intersection of transnational health issues with LGBTQI+ populations. These communities face disproportionate health issues, including higher rates of communicable and non-communicable diseases, compared to cisgender, heterosexual individuals. Moreover, health outcomes within LGBTQI+ populations vary substantially; yet they are often grouped together indiscriminately in analyses.
Many projects spearheaded by the queer community seek to address this gap, particularly in global mental health. They use poetry and art in community spaces and expressive arts psychotherapy (EAP) in queering and decolonising safe spaces, among others. But EAP projects are also often critiqued for not addressing the socio-legal origins of marginalisations and the ramifications of restricted access to advocacy and legal support. Addressing these structural issues through art has been explored by many marginalised communities. Conducting EAP through a socio-legal lens would lend unique perspectives to decolonise global mental health.
This paper presents one such initiative. The Queer Judgments Project (QJP) challenges the articulations in legal judgments regarding sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, and sex characteristics (SOGIESC). Its primary aim is to re-envision, rewrite, and reinterpret judgments addressing SOGIESC issues from queer and complementary perspectives globally.